jueves, 10 de febrero de 2011

Love VS God



Today on my way to work I got lost because I was distracted by an idea that popped into my head. I kept thinking about  *LOVE and all it's variations.

So let's start by describing it: caring, compromise, affection, but it is also suffering.


Basically the question I was asking to myself was: Is love perfection?

I hope you agree with me that God is the only being completely perfect. And this will lead us to another question that would be;  Is God pure love and/or vice-versa?
How can love be perfect if it is so vulnerable? And if God is perfection and love isn't, then he can't be Love at the same time.

Anyway,  I started thinking why would God make us so imperfect if he is so perfect? How can he being perfection, could create something so imperfect (us human)? or maybe  I would better ask Why instead of How!

Could we become perfect by loving? Is that what Saints are? People who love so much that become perfect. Talking about Saints, do they love God more than they love other humans? I don't know a single one that has. So is it loving God much more difficult than loving humans? Or can we love God from loving humans? So this would mean that God is in all humans.

If God wants us to be perfect, then he then wants us to love?

And the questions can continue until I get to a Conclusion, But for now I am so sorry to leave you with the same unresolved doubt or even more confused.

Last thing, if anyone has the answer don't you think about leaving us with the doubt. Spill it out!


*We can find a  more precise definition for LOVE in wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love

martes, 1 de febrero de 2011

Africa, the beginning of a new world..

Could it be? Well, it´s just my theory.

Maybe it´s too early to start talking about this things but, ok, it´s still too early. 
Anyway, the idea of how this world is going to end came up into my head. I know there are lots of theories but I agree with none of them. 
I really think that sooner or later there will be a war. The famous Third World War. The reason for it to start? Unknown. But I guess we all know who would be the countries featuring this war.. 
Yes, the ones you are thinking of.. US, European Union, of course China and we can´t  leave Russia or the other members of the BRICK aside, this would sum Brazil and India. Maybe some other countries in Latin America and Asia, so.. who is missing? BINGO!
Will someone consider one single country in Africa that could be involved? Maybe South Africa is the only one that has the means to deserve a roll in this WWIII but still I don´t think anyone will take it into consideration. 
By the time the WWIII starts, the resources used will be extremely dangerous and the damage: Irreversible. 
Countries affected: All the ones mentioned above and their surroundings. 
Countries free from danger: Mostly all the ones situated in Africa. 
I know this may sound weird but as I said before, it is only my prediction. 
We all know that black genes are still dominant over all other races throughout the rest of the world. 
By the end of WWIII population in most of the countries involved will be disappearing or practically  null. Diseases will start killing the rest of the humans still alive and the only race that won´t be affected, and not just that but will become stronger, is the African. 
So is anyone still totally negative about this possibility? 

When everything is destroyed..  Africans will never die. 

lunes, 17 de enero de 2011

The unreachable stars and bars dream.

Does anyone have an idea of what does the famous "American Dream" really stands for?


Some define it, as no matter what is your background, income and country, you can be anything you want to be as long as you work hard to achieve it. But some others think it consists in just having a family and living happily ever after.

So, is the american dream tangible, material?  Or is it about values, freedom and opportunities?
Maybe it's both,  achieving happiness and everything that is involved with it. After all, the things mentioned above are exactly what everyone aims for.

But then again why people keep calling it "The American Dream" instead of just "A Dream"?
What is it that makes the US so special to be considered a place where happiness, wealthiness and opportunities  are just around the corner? And why is everyone willing to live there?

Let's think of the US as if it was a Night club. It would be the most exclusive one, everyone wanting to get in and the black suited guys at the door would be snobby and selective choosing who has the right to go inside and who doesn't. We maybe have been inside already and had so much fun that we don't care what it takes to get in again. Or maybe we don't know what's inside but if the entry is crowded, it must be great in there.
So, we are waiting outside for our lucky shot. We don't care if we are mistreated, have been waiting too long or wasting our time.
People love that.. Yes we do! The more complicated and difficult for us to access the more we want to gain entrée. But once you get in.. is it worth? Perhaps, but you can also find what you want in another place not that snobby and exclusive.
Maybe the US has a very good marketing strategy to have everyone all over the world overwhelmed, desiring to be part of it.  If they do or don't do it on purpose, they still got me!

I consider myself a victim of the publicity made about the American Dream and I am willing to be a US citizen and live in the 1st world but I have to accept it, that is not my reality.

I am Mexican, I know my country is a 3rd world and far away from being a developed country. But that is why I am here for, to change it, to contribute and make it the best night club ever where everyone will be willing to come and enjoy their lives. A safety and free place to live in. Maybe it will take longer than my life to change it but I am sure that if we start now we can built the famous American Dream for our children and we will be able to stop calling it American Dream and start calling it Pursuing Happiness.

Last but not least, Ben Franklin said: "He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither"

Cuestiones Zodiacales

Siempre he dicho que creer en el horóscopo es para gente ignorante, sin embargo, hace algunos días me enteré que los signos habían cambiado debido a que un *indio  astrólogo, Paul Kunkle, había comprobado una nueva teoría en la cual se suma un nuevo signo zodiacal llamado Ofiuco, por lo que vino a desequilibrar a todos los demás signos. 

Esta cuestión me puso de muy mal humor y me decía a mi misma que si nunca creí en eso, porqué ahora me indigna tanto. Empece a darle vueltas al asunto y llegué a la conclusión que los astros probablemente si influyan en nosotros. Si los mismos planetas que tienen vida por si solos y son inmensamente más grandes que una persona, se ven afectados por lo que los rodea,  nosotros indudablemente también somos afectados de la misma manera. Esto no quiere decir que crea en la predicción del futuro del horóscopo como el que nos muestran  las revistas que encontramos en los anaqueles de la fila para pagar en el supermercado. 
Sin embargo, por algo todas las civilizaciones le dieron una gran importancia, en algunos casos primaria, a los movimientos astrológicos. Hasta para los católicos, en el nacimiento de Jesus, los *Reyes Magos se basaron en la astrología para reconocer el nacimiento del Mesías. 
Lo que trato de decir es que no esta tan perturbada la idea de que los signos zodiacales influyen en nosotros, sin embargo no creo que llegue al punto de que puedan predecir el futuro.  

Pero, ¿podría ser que gracias a la teoría de Paul Kunkle cambie mi signo? ¿A caso puedo pasar de ser una divertida, loca y aventurera doble cara a un aburrido rutinario y leal animal de 4 patas con 2 cuernos y rabo? Y aclaro que  eso de los 2 cuernos seguro le hace honor a que se los ponen de vez en cuando.. cualquiera se aburriría con alguien tan metódico. (Sé que el 50% de mis seguidores se verá ofendido por este comentario, por lo que pido de antemano una disculpa a mis lectores pero es mi percepción de acuerdo a las experiencias que he tenido con uno que otro Tauro).

Resulta ser que yo no tengo ni una sola de las características que le atribuyen a los Tauro. ¿Entonces debo suponer que poco a poco mi personalidad irá cambiando hasta volverse insípida?

Les tengo una buena noticia a todos ustedes que no estén  de acuerdo con el cambio de signo que les corresponda: 
Hay un signo actual y uno antiguo a partir de que se descubrió que empezó a funcionar esta nueva teoría. Si ustedes nacieron bajo la influencia de un signo, a pesar de que ahora cambie, no se verán afectados. La nueva teoría solo aplica para los nacidos bajo el actual horóscopo. 

Quiere decir aunque la teoría Sr. Kunkle es correcta acerca de agregar en treceavo signo al zodiaco, yo no soy ni seré nunca un leal, cariñoso y rutinario taurus, y cada uno de ustedes permanecerán siendo el mismo signo con el que nacieron. 

Al final me quedo tranquila ya que continuaré siendo flexible, adaptable, dispersa y me seguiré aburriendo con facilidad como una autentica Géminis que soy y seguiré siendo siempre. 


* El término indio quiere decir originario del País India. Se hace la aclaración que no se les llama hindú ya que éste termino solo aplica para los que siguen dicha religión.

El término mago procede del griego, magoi. Un magoi significa un matemático, astrónomo y astrólogo. Por entonces la Astrología y la Astronomía no estaban separadas, como hoy lo están, de manera que se creía que los designios humanos podían conocerse si se estudiaban cuidadosamente las estrellas.

viernes, 14 de enero de 2011

The very first one of thousands.. I hope!

So, my first official.. how do you call it? Entry? is that it?

Time ago I heard about blogs but maybe was to occupied to create one myself.. ok we know that's not true, the reason is that I was too lazy to do this.. maybe I still am but now that I took the time to see how it works (which btw is a piece of cake) I hope to be motivated enough to continue writing every day. 

As I said I´m totally new in this so please be patient till I get used to writing long texts. I have to confess that I still don't get it if it's kind of a public diary or what.

Umm.. where to start? first of all I need to thank @jack the creator and CEO of Twitter because if it wasn't for him I wouldn't be in this moment writing my fist .. what was that word again? Entry? ok I'll get used to it. 
Since I discovered twitter, I became an addict by writing everything I do, think and even dream of. But there is a problem with that.. your texts cant be longer than 140 characters and sometimes you really can't express the complete idea in a short phrase and if you think you can by using 10 twits to express the hole thing, you are wrong, that becomes boring and not easy to catch up with. 

I also want to thank a good friend @pacosantamaria who yesterday encouraged me to start this blog. But I think I am the most graceful to myself for stop delaying this. 

So lets begin the adventure! 

PS. Maybe I am the only one reading this shit I'm writing but hope to have some readers soon. Let me know!